Airports

Predictive maintenance software for BHS and aviation security screening equipment.

Amygda reads the data your screening machines and baggage handling systems already produce, scores every asset by risk, and tells your team what needs attention before it stops a belt.

84%
of issues predicted 2 weeks ahead
1,600
maintenance hours saved per year
0
new sensors required
T3-011
Risk Score
43.9%↗ 2.6
AI Insights
SN-038 · Bag TrackingInvestigating

Acquisition data not received on 5 of 8 days, with an increasing trend.

Contributing Systems
Communication68.1
Baggage Handling67.6
Diagnostics45.6
One Place

Every asset, every manufacturer, integrated into one source.

Screening machines from one vendor. Conveyors and sortation from another. Each with its own system, its own logs, its own screen. Amygda integrates those different systems into a single source — and keeps it current as new data lands.

Screening machine logsOEM A
BHS fault codesOEM B
Work orders & job historyMaximo
Technician notesFree text
Bag tracking eventsOps
Amygda Platform

One risk score per asset, updated as data arrives.

No new sensors, no rip-and-replace. The models read what your equipment already produces and rank every asset by how likely it is to fail.

Risk scoresAlertsTerminal viewAI insightsAudit trail
Equipment Coverage

Live on security screening today. Built to extend.

Amygda reads logs, fault codes and maintenance history rather than tapping proprietary sensor feeds. That makes it OEM-agnostic by design — so adding a new equipment class doesn't mean starting over.

Live at UK Airport

Aviation security screening

Hold baggage screening machines, plus the gantry and network they depend on — the equipment that stops bags moving when it fails.

  • Security screening machines
  • Gantry
  • Network
Roadmap

Wider BHS, terminal & airside assets

The same approach applies to any asset with a maintenance history and a fault log. These are next, not deployed today.

  • Conveyors
  • Jet bridges
  • Escalators
  • Airside equipment
No new sensors, no hardware install. If the asset already writes a log or raises a fault code, Amygda can score it.
predictive maintenance for airports

Intervene at the right time, on the right asset.

Every make and model creates data and logs differently. Amygda standardises it across the airport, then hands your maintenance team the evidence, the diagnostics and the remaining useful life behind every score. So the airport keeps running at high availability — without anyone reading the millions of records, manually, your equipment writes each week.

Risk Scores High risk Sorted by score Terminal 3
T3-011
Risk Score
43.9%↗ 2.6
AI Insights
SN-014In service
T3-020
Risk Score
39.8%↗ 9.9
AI Insights
SN-038In service
T3-021
Risk Score
36.4%↘ 1.6
AI Insights
SN-039In service
AI Insights — T3-020
Communication68.1
Data Transfer

Acquisition data not received and data chain process died logs present on 5 out of 8 days, with increasing trends.

Motion Control17.3
Motion Safety

Disable loop open log present on 5 out of 8 days, showing an increasing trend.

The evidence

The actual log entries behind the score, and how many days they've been building.

The diagnostics

Which subsystem is driving the risk, so the team knows what to look at before they open it up.

The remaining useful life

How long you've got before it fails, so the work lands in a planned window instead of a disruption.

Proven in production

Running today at a major UK airport.

Deployed on live airport security screening equipment, scoring risk from the data the airport already produces.

84%
of equipment issues predicted up to two weeks before failure.
1,600
maintenance hours saved per year across the airport.
3
OEM machine types monitored through the same platform.
Live deployment, not a pilot. Customer name available under NDA.
Get Started

See what's hiding in your airport maintenance data.

Bring a sample of your screening or BHS data and we'll show you what Amygda finds in it. Or just come and see our walkthrough!.

Typical implementation: 2–4 weeks.
What the walkthrough covers
Your data, not a demo setRisk scores generated from your own logs and work orders.
The evidence behind each scoreWhich subsystem is driving risk, and the log entries proving it.
What integration actually takesWhich systems we read, and what your team needs to provide.